|
September 30, 2002 01:59 pm ET - research by Briel
summoned King Bugbear vs. summoned Ettin |
Briel sent us this email about some research he has done on the HK servers. This goes along the lines of what NEO from Dep server (the only 52+ mage) was saying before he quit.
One of the mages in HK server has leveled to 52. He felt that the new
Ettin summons is weaker than the bugbear king summons. Therefore we did a
test to compare the power of ettins summon and bugbear king summon.
Bugbear King
HP: 330
MP: 30
Lv: 28 (in HK server)
Attack Speed: 68.57 time/minute
Hasted Attack Speed: 85.71 time/minute
Walking Speed: 90 step/minute
Hasted Walking Speed: 120 step/minute
Ettin
HP: 380
MP: 70
Lv: 33 (in HK server)
Attack Speed: 49.66 time/minute
Hasted Attack Speed: 62.09 time/minute
Walking Speed: 90 step/minute
Hasted Walking Speed: 120 step/minute
1st Match: bugbear king vs ettin, bugbear king attack first.
Winner: bugbear king (about 30% HP left)
2nd Match: bugbear king vs ettin, ettin king attack first.
Winner: bugbear king (about 10% HP left)
3rd Match: bugbear king(hasted) vs ettin(hasted), bugbear king attack
first.
Winner: bugbear king (about 45% HP left)
4th Match: bugbear king(hasted) vs ettin(hasted), ettin attack first.
Winner: bugbear king (about 5% HP left)
As a result, no matter who attack first, and hasted or not, bugbear king
summon is stronger than the ettin summon!
|
|
September 30, 2002 02:00 pm ET (#1)
|
September 30, 2002 02:02 pm ET (#2)
|
September 30, 2002 02:05 pm ET (#3)
|
September 30, 2002 02:12 pm ET (#4)
|
September 30, 2002 02:17 pm ET (#5)
|
September 30, 2002 02:22 pm ET (#6)
|
September 30, 2002 02:30 pm ET (#7)
|
September 30, 2002 02:35 pm ET (#8)
|
September 30, 2002 03:03 pm ET (#9)
|
September 30, 2002 03:23 pm ET (#10)
|
September 30, 2002 03:54 pm ET (#11)
|
September 30, 2002 03:58 pm ET (#12)
|
September 30, 2002 04:18 pm ET (#13)
|
September 30, 2002 04:18 pm ET (#14)
|
September 30, 2002 04:18 pm ET (#15)
|
September 30, 2002 04:34 pm ET (#16)
|
September 30, 2002 04:48 pm ET (#17)
|
September 30, 2002 04:51 pm ET (#18)
|
September 30, 2002 04:59 pm ET (#19)
|
September 30, 2002 05:04 pm ET (#20)
|
September 30, 2002 05:23 pm ET (#21)
|
September 30, 2002 05:26 pm ET (#22)
|
September 30, 2002 05:47 pm ET (#23)
|
September 30, 2002 06:03 pm ET (#24)
|
September 30, 2002 06:16 pm ET (#25)
|
September 30, 2002 06:22 pm ET (#26)
|
September 30, 2002 06:27 pm ET (#27)
|
September 30, 2002 06:36 pm ET (#28)
|
September 30, 2002 06:46 pm ET (#29)
|
September 30, 2002 06:50 pm ET (#30)
|
September 30, 2002 07:01 pm ET (#31)
|
September 30, 2002 07:02 pm ET (#32)
|
September 30, 2002 07:38 pm ET (#33)
|
September 30, 2002 07:47 pm ET (#34)
|
September 30, 2002 07:55 pm ET (#35)
|
September 30, 2002 07:58 pm ET (#36)
|
September 30, 2002 08:05 pm ET (#37)
|
September 30, 2002 08:10 pm ET (#38)
|
September 30, 2002 08:32 pm ET (#39)
|
September 30, 2002 08:39 pm ET (#40)
|
September 30, 2002 09:05 pm ET (#41)
|
September 30, 2002 09:14 pm ET (#42)
|
September 30, 2002 09:34 pm ET (#43)
|
September 30, 2002 09:36 pm ET (#44)
|
September 30, 2002 09:39 pm ET (#45)
|
September 30, 2002 09:40 pm ET (#46)
|
September 30, 2002 09:41 pm ET (#47)
|
September 30, 2002 09:43 pm ET (#48)
|
September 30, 2002 09:56 pm ET (#49)
|
September 30, 2002 10:02 pm ET (#50)
|
September 30, 2002 10:03 pm ET (#51)
|
September 30, 2002 10:52 pm ET (#52)
|
September 30, 2002 10:52 pm ET (#53)
|
September 30, 2002 11:09 pm ET (#54)
|
September 30, 2002 11:10 pm ET (#55)
|
September 30, 2002 11:47 pm ET (#56)
|
October 01, 2002 12:24 am ET (#57)
|
October 01, 2002 12:29 am ET (#58)
|
October 01, 2002 12:35 am ET (#59)
|
October 01, 2002 01:24 am ET (#60)
|
October 01, 2002 01:41 am ET (#61)
|
October 01, 2002 01:50 am ET (#62)
|
October 01, 2002 04:08 am ET (#63)
|
October 01, 2002 04:41 am ET (#64)
|
October 01, 2002 05:02 am ET (#65)
|
October 01, 2002 01:08 pm ET (#66)
|
October 01, 2002 02:45 pm ET (#67)
|
October 01, 2002 07:08 pm ET (#68)
|
October 01, 2002 09:11 pm ET (#69)
|
October 01, 2002 10:07 pm ET (#70)
|
October 01, 2002 11:18 pm ET (#71)
|
October 01, 2002 11:59 pm ET (#72)
|
October 02, 2002 02:31 am ET (#73)
|
October 03, 2002 01:19 am ET (#74)
|
Meaningless posts will be deleted. You don't have to post
on *every* article. ^^ |
|
Rules:
- Do not use sexually explicit, hateful, or racially offensive language.
- Do not post several comments in a row or any other kind of spam.
- Stick to the topic. If you want to start a new topic go to the official forums.
- Please post in English.
- Do not use Lineage Compendium as a place to sell or buy Lineage items or accounts for real money.
- Do not impersonate any NCSoft or Lineage Compendium employee.
- Please take up any banning issues in email with the moderator, BigPope, not in the comments or forums.
Violating any rule will usually get your post deleted. Repeat offenders will find their posting privileges
revoked. Violating rule #1 may also get you banned from the whole site. Thanks!
|
|