|
February 24, 2003 05:34 pm ET - research by amateras
Light - Level 70 Knight |
Lineage Playforum (http://community.playforum.net:8080/bbs/prog/column?action=read&iid=10051003&kid=1861) reports that Light (the second highest level player in Lineage in the world) has reached level 70. (It took 5 months to get from 65 to 70).
Light plays on Arain server in Korea. When we last saw him at level 65 in September, he had 864 HP (now 965 HP), 56 MP (now 60 MP), STR 24 with Power Gloves and STR amulet (now STR 25 with nothing) and AC -83 (now AC -97).
Light says that gaining experience has made levelling very hard since level 65. It took him 9 hours of DVC hunting to get 1% (since level 65).
He invested in STR, DEX and CON with his level up bonuses, but he didn't notice a big increase in his ability to hunt with CON. In fact, he even said he regretted putting points in CON. He commented that he is sure that Poseidon feels the same way about his CON points. He was hoping there would be some update in the future which would increase the purpose of CON, but so far nothing. Since his STR is maxed out (you cannot get your base stat points past 25, you would need items to get higher), he has been dismissing the window which asks him which stat to add to without making a decision (it comes up every time you log in, if you don't pick).
Playforum asked him if he had any advice to level 51+ knights about what stat to pick and he answered definitively, STR. He says DEX is good, it increases your AC and all, but STR should be first, then DEX. (I suppose you can plan that way if you plan to get to level 70 ^^) He pointed out that DEX knights hurt him much less than STR knights.
Also posted in the article is his hunting partner, elf "Han Byul". Here is a piece of the screenshot below:
|
|
February 24, 2003 05:36 pm ET (#1)
|
February 24, 2003 05:36 pm ET (#2)
|
February 24, 2003 05:36 pm ET (#3)
|
February 24, 2003 05:37 pm ET (#4)
|
February 24, 2003 05:39 pm ET (#5)
|
February 24, 2003 05:39 pm ET (#6)
|
February 24, 2003 05:40 pm ET (#7)
|
February 24, 2003 05:42 pm ET (#8)
|
February 24, 2003 05:42 pm ET (#9)
|
February 24, 2003 05:44 pm ET (#10)
|
February 24, 2003 05:48 pm ET (#11)
|
February 24, 2003 05:48 pm ET (#12)
|
February 24, 2003 05:49 pm ET (#13)
|
February 24, 2003 05:54 pm ET (#14)
|
February 24, 2003 05:55 pm ET (#15)
|
February 24, 2003 05:59 pm ET (#16)
|
February 24, 2003 06:13 pm ET (#17)
|
February 24, 2003 06:15 pm ET (#18)
|
February 24, 2003 06:20 pm ET (#19)
|
February 24, 2003 06:20 pm ET (#20)
|
February 24, 2003 06:21 pm ET (#21)
|
February 24, 2003 06:21 pm ET (#22)
|
February 24, 2003 06:24 pm ET (#23)
|
February 24, 2003 06:35 pm ET (#24)
|
February 24, 2003 06:37 pm ET (#25)
|
February 24, 2003 06:56 pm ET (#26)
|
February 24, 2003 06:58 pm ET (#27)
|
February 24, 2003 07:02 pm ET (#28)
|
February 24, 2003 07:13 pm ET (#29)
|
February 24, 2003 07:13 pm ET (#30)
|
February 24, 2003 07:34 pm ET (#31)
|
February 24, 2003 07:56 pm ET (#32)
|
February 24, 2003 08:30 pm ET (#33)
|
February 24, 2003 08:55 pm ET (#34)
|
February 24, 2003 09:24 pm ET (#35)
|
February 24, 2003 09:26 pm ET (#36)
|
February 24, 2003 09:41 pm ET (#37)
|
February 24, 2003 10:20 pm ET (#38)
|
February 24, 2003 11:27 pm ET (#39)
|
February 24, 2003 11:31 pm ET (#40)
|
February 24, 2003 11:49 pm ET (#41)
|
February 24, 2003 11:56 pm ET (#42)
|
February 25, 2003 12:46 am ET (#43)
|
February 25, 2003 01:04 am ET (#44)
|
February 25, 2003 01:25 am ET (#45)
|
February 25, 2003 01:25 am ET (#46)
|
February 25, 2003 01:32 am ET (#47)
|
February 25, 2003 02:02 am ET (#48)
|
February 25, 2003 02:03 am ET (#49)
|
February 25, 2003 02:12 am ET (#50)
|
February 25, 2003 02:31 am ET (#51)
|
February 25, 2003 02:56 am ET (#52)
|
February 25, 2003 03:00 am ET (#53)
|
February 25, 2003 03:47 am ET (#54)
|
February 25, 2003 06:18 am ET (#55)
|
February 25, 2003 07:33 am ET (#56)
|
February 25, 2003 01:22 pm ET (#57)
|
February 25, 2003 03:30 pm ET (#58)
|
February 25, 2003 07:25 pm ET (#59)
|
February 25, 2003 08:35 pm ET (#60)
|
February 25, 2003 09:19 pm ET (#61)
|
February 25, 2003 11:22 pm ET (#62)
|
February 26, 2003 06:13 am ET (#63)
|
March 03, 2003 02:59 am ET (#64)
|
Meaningless posts will be deleted. You don't have to post
on *every* article. ^^ |
|
Rules:
- Do not use sexually explicit, hateful, or racially offensive language.
- Do not post several comments in a row or any other kind of spam.
- Stick to the topic. If you want to start a new topic go to the official forums.
- Please post in English.
- Do not use Lineage Compendium as a place to sell or buy Lineage items or accounts for real money.
- Do not impersonate any NCSoft or Lineage Compendium employee.
- Please take up any banning issues in email with the moderator, BigPope, not in the comments or forums.
Violating any rule will usually get your post deleted. Repeat offenders will find their posting privileges
revoked. Violating rule #1 may also get you banned from the whole site. Thanks!
|
|