|
February 24, 2003 02:14 am ET - research by amer
Aden Siege - 2/23 |
Well, the first Aden siege is over and Ken was killed on Ken and Dep (Ken Rauhel prevailed on LoA). On Ken, Cerenis was killed early on, but Ken Rauhel lasted 1 hour and 4 minutes. Dep finished off Ken Rauhel about 20 minutes faster. Quite a few people were healing and hasting Ken Rauhel on both servers and almost any knight who got close enough to engage Ken Rauhel had to deal with more damage being dealt by other siege participants than Ken Rauhel himself.
I personally didn't expect anyone to win since there were so many people just screwing around and harassing others, but fortunately the efforts of those who were trying to do the right thing were rewarded :) (As an example, LordBalroq lost over 200% fighting Ken Rauhel - what a waste of time that would have been if the healing and hasting resulted in Ken Rauhel prevailing at the end!)
In the Aden siege, the siege ends immediately upon the death of Ken Rauhel (no defending) and the server announces the person responsible for killing Ken Rauhel. It is unclear if the winner is the one that deals the most damage or the one that deals the death blow. Regardless, on Ken server it was DEMONIAN of WestKnights and on Dep server it was BaekHo of 4EverGF.
There was also a theory that if you didn't declare, then none of your members could injure Ken Rauhel. However, some people sent me emails showing that they actually gained experience from Ken Rauhel's death, even though their pledge did not declare. So, perhaps that's not true.
On Ken server, neither Cerenis nor Ken Rauhel dropped any Armor Set items (or so they say! o.o) Perhaps those items are not implemented yet (or people are keeping it a secret for some reason)
More info from Dep and LoA to come and congrats to the winners!
|
|
February 24, 2003 02:15 am ET (#1)
|
February 24, 2003 02:16 am ET (#2)
|
February 24, 2003 02:16 am ET (#3)
|
February 24, 2003 02:19 am ET (#4)
|
February 24, 2003 02:23 am ET (#5)
|
February 24, 2003 02:31 am ET (#6)
|
February 24, 2003 02:31 am ET (#7)
|
February 24, 2003 02:35 am ET (#8)
|
February 24, 2003 02:39 am ET (#9)
|
February 24, 2003 02:42 am ET (#10)
|
February 24, 2003 02:47 am ET (#11)
|
February 24, 2003 02:49 am ET (#12)
|
February 24, 2003 02:50 am ET (#13)
|
February 24, 2003 02:51 am ET (#14)
|
February 24, 2003 02:56 am ET (#15)
|
February 24, 2003 02:59 am ET (#16)
|
February 24, 2003 03:02 am ET (#17)
|
February 24, 2003 03:04 am ET (#18)
|
February 24, 2003 03:05 am ET (#19)
|
February 24, 2003 03:09 am ET (#20)
|
February 24, 2003 03:09 am ET (#21)
|
February 24, 2003 03:19 am ET (#22)
|
February 24, 2003 03:21 am ET (#23)
|
February 24, 2003 03:23 am ET (#24)
|
February 24, 2003 03:26 am ET (#25)
|
February 24, 2003 03:26 am ET (#26)
|
February 24, 2003 03:28 am ET (#27)
|
February 24, 2003 03:30 am ET (#28)
|
February 24, 2003 03:31 am ET (#30)
|
February 24, 2003 03:39 am ET (#31)
|
February 24, 2003 03:44 am ET (#32)
|
February 24, 2003 03:54 am ET (#33)
|
February 24, 2003 03:55 am ET (#34)
|
February 24, 2003 04:01 am ET (#35)
|
February 24, 2003 04:23 am ET (#36)
|
February 24, 2003 04:48 am ET (#37)
|
February 24, 2003 05:23 am ET (#38)
|
February 24, 2003 05:33 am ET (#39)
|
February 24, 2003 05:51 am ET (#40)
|
February 24, 2003 07:13 am ET (#41)
|
February 24, 2003 07:33 am ET (#42)
|
February 24, 2003 08:21 am ET (#43)
|
February 24, 2003 08:21 am ET (#44)
|
February 24, 2003 08:36 am ET (#45)
|
February 24, 2003 08:40 am ET (#46)
|
February 24, 2003 09:04 am ET (#47)
|
February 24, 2003 09:28 am ET (#48)
|
February 24, 2003 10:45 am ET (#49)
|
February 24, 2003 10:46 am ET (#50)
|
February 24, 2003 11:16 am ET (#51)
|
February 24, 2003 11:16 am ET (#52)
|
February 24, 2003 11:58 am ET (#53)
|
February 24, 2003 12:13 pm ET (#54)
|
February 24, 2003 12:22 pm ET (#55)
|
February 24, 2003 12:23 pm ET (#56)
|
February 24, 2003 12:37 pm ET (#57)
|
February 24, 2003 01:28 pm ET (#58)
|
February 24, 2003 01:34 pm ET (#59)
|
February 24, 2003 02:21 pm ET (#60)
|
February 24, 2003 03:38 pm ET (#61)
|
February 24, 2003 04:06 pm ET (#62)
|
February 24, 2003 04:47 pm ET (#63)
|
February 24, 2003 04:48 pm ET (#64)
|
February 24, 2003 05:31 pm ET (#65)
|
February 24, 2003 05:44 pm ET (#66)
|
February 24, 2003 06:44 pm ET (#67)
|
February 24, 2003 07:30 pm ET (#68)
|
February 24, 2003 08:34 pm ET (#69)
|
February 24, 2003 08:54 pm ET (#70)
|
February 24, 2003 09:34 pm ET (#71)
|
February 24, 2003 09:55 pm ET (#72)
|
February 24, 2003 10:00 pm ET (#73)
|
February 24, 2003 11:04 pm ET (#74)
|
February 25, 2003 01:22 am ET (#75)
|
February 25, 2003 06:27 am ET (#76)
|
February 25, 2003 02:49 pm ET (#77)
|
February 25, 2003 05:12 pm ET (#78)
|
February 25, 2003 07:55 pm ET (#79)
|
February 27, 2003 08:08 pm ET (#80)
|
February 28, 2003 04:25 am ET (#81)
|
Meaningless posts will be deleted. You don't have to post
on *every* article. ^^ |
|
Rules:
- Do not use sexually explicit, hateful, or racially offensive language.
- Do not post several comments in a row or any other kind of spam.
- Stick to the topic. If you want to start a new topic go to the official forums.
- Please post in English.
- Do not use Lineage Compendium as a place to sell or buy Lineage items or accounts for real money.
- Do not impersonate any NCSoft or Lineage Compendium employee.
- Please take up any banning issues in email with the moderator, BigPope, not in the comments or forums.
Violating any rule will usually get your post deleted. Repeat offenders will find their posting privileges
revoked. Violating rule #1 may also get you banned from the whole site. Thanks!
|
|